Your banning was a bit of an injustice Snooks, just quoting what someone else said
There’s still a msg for me about that over at Reaper HQ that I’ve avoided opening
Drumphil, Judders and Syd all got banned for actually abusing people (Syd also for stalking and other activities)
I never got banned there myself, although I did a million posts about Syria
Kenny alluded to banning me once in that infamous locked thread
Something like that
I’ve called people shills/narcs/stasi etc before, but they self-admitted those already
I leave the name-calling to the resident dems
I told one troll to fuck off, and I shouldn’t have, and I was banned for a week. And that was nothing to do with politics. Not even in the lounge. I deserved it, and I never complained, because I should have behaved in a more civil manner.
That Assange wanted the Panama papers released in a way that favored Russia when in fact he wanted them released in a way that didn’t favor any entity. But obviously THAT’S what you deem to be be ‘favoring Russia’ i.e the not targeting of Russia in particular.
That Assange doxxed Turkish women. Where the fuck you got that from is anyone’s guess but it’s utter bullshit as pointed out by Cyrano in detail in the old forum. I’m sure if someone hadn’t done that you’d have been glad to let that stinking lie, one of many, ferment forever.
You and Judders were pushing the fake rape allegations against Assange and claimed he could return to Sweden to clear it up if he were innocent, but you knew the threat of US extradition was the real reason he couldn’t go to Sweden, and to make matters worse you chose not to mention the fact that the Swedish prosecutor was denied a meeting with Assange at the Embassy to clear matters. The swamp inc you wanted to maintain the fake news narrative that Assange wasn’t willing to meet with Sweden authorities. Sweden dropped the case as it was only a technicality, not a forced sexual assault at all, otherwise Sweden would not have dropped the case.
Claims that Assange endangered US personnel with the release of Afghan war logs. The swamp fills out some redacted info or other from Wikileaks and then calls out Assange for it. More bullshit, Assange was extremely careful with redactions. The original Wikileaks docs should be consulted, not the fake news version.
And that it was somehow remiss of Assange to not release absolutely everything that was in the Afghan war logs, when obviously requisition orders for paper clips and coffee would only serve to dilute the important stuff. But that didn’t stop you or Judders implying there was some magick sauce in the omitted communiques that somehow would have made some big difference, like what? that the Russians dunnit?
Then there was the line that the Trump admin was specifically the one going after Assange, but the team designated to persecute Assange had already formed in the years before Trump became POTUS.
There’s more, but I’m not bothered to dig out the old lounge page files atm
And to add to the absurdity about the Afghan war logs related claims i.e fake ‘allegations’ against Assange is that the actual wars themselves aren’t criticised for putting lives at risk, let alone killing masses of people, nor has the msm WMD type lies that prepare the fake excuses for such wars been criticised [rarely if ever] by those who hate Assange/other whistleblowers. Fkn ludicrous.